Volume 15, Issue 8 · IJARST · ISSN 2319-1783 / 2320-1126

Reading Comprehension Strategies for Discipline-Specific Texts among University Students: A Literature Review and Implications for Language Education

Reading Comprehension Strategies for Discipline-Specific Texts among University Students: A Literature Review and Implications for Language Education is an open-access, peer-reviewed research paper by Nguyễn Thị Gấm, published in Volume 15, Issue 8 of the International Journal of Advanced Research in Science and Technology (IJARST), a UGC-approved journal (Print ISSN 2319-1783, Online ISSN 2320-1126).

Author

Nguyễn Thị Gấm

Abstract

This literature review synthesizes evidence on the strategies university students use to comprehend textbooks and discipline-specific texts and derives implications for language education. A structured search of Scopus retrieved 790 records, of which 15 journal articles published between 1986 and 2023 met the inclusion criteria. Findings were examined through thematic synthesis. Four interrelated strategy categories emerged: cognitive processing strategies, metacognitive monitoring and regulation, learning-support strategies, and text-structure strategies. Across the studies, strategy use varied according to reading and linguistic proficiency, prior disciplinary knowledge, field of study, text characteristics, presentation format, and task demands. Evidence from survey, think-aloud, and intervention research also showed that different designs illuminate different aspects of reading and should not be treated as directly equivalent. Nevertheless, intervention studies consistently indicated that explicit strategy instruction can improve comprehension and content retention when it is aligned with text type, learner characteristics, course content, and expected learning outcomes. The synthesis further highlights the need to support both print and digital reading, including navigation, attention management, and link evaluation in hypertext environments. The review concludes that reading strategy instruction should be integrated into discipline-specific course teaching and assessed through both comprehension outcomes and process-based evidence. These findings provide a focused basis for designing textbook-reading support in university language programs.

Keywords: Reading comprehension strategies; discipline-specific texts; university students; language education; strategy instruction

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62226/ijarst20262790

References

Bećirović, S., Brdarević-Čeljo, A., & Sinanović, J. (2017). The use of metacognitive reading strategies among students at International Burch University: A case study. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(4), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2017.4.645

Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463–494. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586295

Chen, J., & Intaraprasert, C. (2014). Reading strategies employed by university Business English majors with different levels of reading proficiency. English Language Teaching, 7(4), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n4p25

Daguay-James, H., & Bulusan, F. (2020). Metacognitive strategies on reading English texts of ESL freshmen: A sequential explanatory mixed design. TESOL International Journal, 15(1), 20–30.

Karimi, M. N. (2018). Prior topical knowledge and L2 proficiency as determinants of strategic processing in English for Academic Purposes multi-texts comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2016.1177058

Latawiec, B. (2010). Text structure awareness as a metacognitive strategy facilitating EFL/ESL reading comprehension and academic achievement. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 17(5), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v17i05/47021

Nergis, A. (2013). Exploring the factors that affect reading comprehension of EAP learners. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.09.001

Pascual, G., & Goikoetxea, E. (2014). Comprehension of university texts: Effects of domain-knowledge and summary. Reading Psychology, 35(2), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2012.664612

Pereira Rojas, S. I. (2016). Conciencia metacognitiva y estrategias de lectura en un contexto pro-AICLE a nivel universitario [Metacognitive awareness and reading comprehension in a pro-CLIL university setting]. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 21(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v21n01a06

Ritchey, K. A., & List, A. (2022). Task-oriented reading: A framework for improving college students' reading compliance and comprehension. College Teaching, 70(3), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2021.1924607

Schwartz, A. I., Mendoza, L., & Meyer, B. (2017). The impact of text structure reading strategy instruction in a second language: Benefits across languages. The Language Learning Journal, 45(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.837092

Seifoori, Z. (2020). Negotiated strategic awareness-raising at postgraduate level: Contributions to reading comprehension and content retention. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2020.120892

Shang, H.-F. (2018). EFL medical students' metacognitive strategy use for hypertext reading comprehension. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(2), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9156-y

Taraban, R., Kerr, M., & Rynearson, K. (2004). Analytic and pragmatic factors in college students' metacognitive reading strategies. Reading Psychology, 25(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710490435547

Yapp, D., de Graaff, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2021). Improving second language reading comprehension through reading strategies: A meta-analysis of L2 reading strategy interventions. Journal of Second Language Studies, 4(1), 154–192. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19013.yap

Yapp, D., de Graaff, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2023). Effects of reading strategy instruction in English as a second language on students' academic reading comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 27(6), 1456–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820985236

DOI

10.62226/ijarst20262790

PAGES : 2559-2566 | 2 VIEWS | 2 DOWNLOADS

How do you cite this paper?

Nguyễn Thị Gấm — “Reading Comprehension Strategies for Discipline-Specific Texts among University Students: A Literature Review and Implications for Language Education.” International Journal of Advanced Research in Science and Technology (IJARST), Volume 15, Issue 8. DOI: 10.62226/ijarst20262790.

Read / Download Full Article