Volume 15, Issue 6

Detection and Analysis of Eavesdropping Attacks on Quantum Key Distribution BB84 Protocol

Author

Godala Madhu

Abstract

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) provides an innovative approach for secure communication by utilizing the principles of quantum mechanics. Among various QKD protocols, the BB84 protocol remains the most widely studied and implemented due to its simplicity and theoretical security guarantees. However, practical implementations of BB84 are vulnerable to several eavesdropping attacks and channel imperfections. This paper presents a comprehensive study on the detection and analysis of eavesdropping attacks in the BB84 protocol. The work focuses on common attacks such as intercept-resend attack, photon-number splitting attack, Trojan horse attack, and phase-covariant cloning attack. The effect of these attacks on Quantum Bit Error Rate (QBER) is analyzed in detail. Simulation-based observations are discussed to demonstrate how QBER increases under malicious interference. The study further explores statistical methods for detecting eavesdropping and examines practical countermeasures including decoy states, privacy amplification, and error correction techniques. The paper concludes that BB84 remains robust against eavesdropping when proper detection and mitigation mechanisms are employed.

Keywords: Quantum Key Distribution, BB84 Protocol, Eavesdropping Detection, Quantum Cryptography, QBER, Intercept-Resend Attack, Quantum Security.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62226/ijarst20262701

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=wnRawV4AAAAJ&sortby=pubdate&authuser=4&citation_for_view=wnRawV4AAAAJ:jSAVyFp_754C

References

1. C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, “Quantum Cryptography: Public Key Distribution and Coin Tossing,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, 1984.
2. A. K. Ekert, “Quantum Cryptography Based on Bell’s Theorem,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 661–663, 1991.
3. N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, “Quantum Cryptography,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 74, pp. 145–195, 2002.
4. V. Scarani et al., “The Security of Practical Quantum Key Distribution,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, pp. 1301–1350, 2009.
5. Jaydeep Rath, Prajwal Panth, and P. S. N. Bhaskar, “Quantum Bit Error Rate Analysis in BB84 Quantum Key Distribution: Measurement, Statistical Estimation, and Eavesdropping Detection,” arXiv, 2026.
6. Brian Pigott et al., “Eavesdropping on the BB84 Protocol using Phase-Covariant Cloning: Experimental Results,” arXiv, 2024.
7. María Lourdes Simón Codina, “Quantum Key Distribution with BB84: Breidbart-Based Eavesdropping and Channel Noise Effects,” Universitat de Barcelona, 2025.
8. Ivan Sushchev et al., “Realistic Vulnerabilities of Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution,” Scientific Reports, 2025.
9. T. Decker, M. Gallezot, S. F. Kerstan, A. Paesano, and W. Wormsbecher, “Quantum Key Distribution as a Quantum Machine Learning Task,” npj Quantum Information, vol. 11, no. 140, 2025.
10. G. Thakur, P. Chouksey, M. Chopra, and S. Kumar, “A Comprehensive Review on the Hybrid BB84-E91 QKD Protocol for Enhanced Security Efficiency and Practical Hardware Implementation in Quantum Cryptography,” Discover Computing, vol. 28, no. 343, 2025.
11. A. M. Reforgiato et al., “Estimating Interception Density in the BB84 Protocol: A Study with a Noisy Quantum Simulator,” Future Internet, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 275, 2024.
12. D. Scalcon, E. Bazzani, G. Vallone, P. Villoresi, and M. Avesani, “Low-Error Encoder for Time-Bin and Decoy States for Quantum Key Distribution,” npj Quantum Information, vol. 11, no. 22, 2025.
13. Y. Zhang et al., “Imperfect Preparation and Trojan Attack on the Phase Modulator in the Decoy-State BB84 Protocol,” Optics Communications, vol. 593, pp. 132175, 2025.
14. L. A. Lizama-Perez and J. M. López-Romero, “Loop-Back Quantum Key Distribution for Secure and Scalable Multi-Node Quantum Networks,” Symmetry, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 521, 2025.
15. H. Termos, “Quantum Authentication Evolution: Novel Approaches for Securing Quantum Key Distribution,” Entropy, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 447, 2024.
16. X. Liu et al., “Enhanced QKD Protocol Based on Zero-Knowledge Proof and Post-Quantum Signature,” Optics Communications, vol. 596, pp. 132431, 2025.
17. M. Manimozhi and R. K. Mugelan, “Post-Quantum AES Encryption Using ECC Points Derived from BB84 Sifted Keys,” EPJ Quantum Technology, vol. 12, no. 109, 2025.
18. J. Rath, P. Panth, and P. S. N. Bhaskar, “Quantum Bit Error Rate Analysis in BB84 Quantum Key Distribution: Measurement, Statistical Estimation, and Eavesdropping Detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.27278, 2026.
19. C. Dunne, “High Dimensional Quantum Eavesdropping: A Hypothetical Attack on BB84 and SSP,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08487, 2024.
20. S. K. Reddy and C. Mohan, “Comprehensive Analysis of BB84, A Quantum Key Distribution Protocol,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.05609, 2023.
21. A. Pokharel, R. Dangol, and H. K. Neupane, “Quantum Key Distribution Using BB84 Protocol: A Computational Study of Error Rates,” Journal of Nepal Physical Society, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 2025. 
22. M. Young, M. Lucamarini, and S. Pirandola, “Autonomous Recognition of Erroneous Raw Key Bit Bias in Quantum Key Distribution,” Scientific Reports, vol. 16, Article no. 598, 2026.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.62226/ijarst20262701

PAGES : 2050-2054 | 9 VIEWS | 2 DOWNLOADS

Download Full Article