Volume 14, Issue 12

Achieving Electrical Flexibility in Offices via Non-Traditional Systems

Author

Zaher Abdullah Salah

Abstract

Abstract:
This study aims to qualitative analysis of non-traditional electrical distribution systems, specifically Systems Furniture, on the flexibility of electrical network design in modern office buildings. With the evolution of work environment concepts such as open-plan offices, hot-desking, and hybrid work, there is a growing need for electrical infrastructures that can respond quickly and efficiently to frequent internal layout changes without requiring costly and disruptive modification works. The article investigates the design principles and technical means that enable these systems to achieve high levels of flexibility, reviews their advantages and challenges, and proposes a framework for engineers and designers to adopt these solutions.

References:
1.    National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). (2023). NFPA 70: National Electrical Code (NEC). National Fire Protection Association.
2.    International Code Council (ICC). (2021). International Building Code (IBC). International Code Council.
3.    BSRIA. (2018). Flexible Office Design: A Guide to Briefing and Procurement (BG 82/2018). BSRIA Limited.
4.    Kim, J., & Candido, C., Thomas, L., & de Dear, R. (2016). Desk ownership in the workplace: The effect of non-territorial working on employee workplace satisfaction, perceived productivity and health. Building and Environment.
5.    Candido, C., Kim, J., de Dear, R., & Thomas, L. (2019). Bouncing back: The role of office design in resilience. 
6.    Gorgievski, M., van der Voordt, T., van Meel, J., & van der Zwart, J. (2010). Why do firms invest in flexible workplace practices? A conceptual model and review of research.
7.    Veitch, J. A., Charles, K. E., Farley, K. M. J., & Newsham, G. R. (2007). A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings. 
8.    Bordass, B., & Leaman, A. (2013). *Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 3: Case studies of the use of techniques in the workplace*. Usable Buildings Trust.
9.    Kroner, W. M. (1997). An intelligent and responsive architecture. Automation in Construction.
10.    McGraw Hill Construction. (2014). The Drive Toward Healthier Buildings: The Market Drivers and Impact of Building Design on Occupant Health, Well-Being and Productivity. SmartMarket Report.
11.    U.S. General Services Administration (GSA). (2022). Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings Service (P100). Chapter 3.8: Integrated Building Systems.
12.    JLL. (2021). The Future of Work: How the Office Will Evolve. Jones Lang LaSalle IP, Inc.
13.    Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Kemperman, A., van de Water, A., Weijs-Perrée, M., & Verhaegh, J. (2021). The impact of activity-based flexible office on communication, collaboration, autonomy, and privacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 77, 101683.
14.    Bae, J., & Kim, J. (2022). Smart office and sustainable workplace: A review of energy flexibility, occupant comfort, and space utilization technologies. Sustainable Cities and Society, 87, 104181.
15.    CBRE. (2023). 2023 Global Workplace Flexibility Report. CBRE Research.
16.    Deloitte. (2022). The smart office of tomorrow: Integrating technology, space, and experience. Deloitte Insights.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.62226/ijarst20252600

PAGES : 1746-1753 | 3 VIEWS | 1 DOWNLOADS

Download Full Article