Volume 14, Issue 12

From Hype too Fit-For-Purpose: Assessing the Viability of Hydrogen as Clean Energy

Author

Engr. John Bender, Dr. Isaac C. Okereke and Mr. Meiko Tourista W, MM

Abstract

Abstract:
Hydrogen is increasingly positioned as a critical energy vector for achieving global decarbonization and meeting climate neutrality targets. However, significant ambiguity exists regarding which hydrogen production pathways can deliver genuine environmental and economic benefits. This paper systematically evaluates the viability of hydrogen as a clean energy solution, examining production methodologies, technological maturity, cost economics, and implementation challenges. Through comprehensive analysis of green, blue, and grey hydrogen pathways, this study reveals a persistent ambition-implementation gap where only 7% of global capacity announcements meet scheduled timelines (Odenweller and Ueckerdt, 2024). While green hydrogen demonstrates long-term potential, particularly for hard-to-electrify sectors, near-term viability remains constrained by high production costs ($4.4/kg currently, projected to decline to $2.4/kg by 2030), renewable energy requirements, and insufficient infrastructure development. The paper identifies critical success factors including technological advancement in electrolysis, cost reduction through economies of scale, supportive policy frameworks, and demand-side coordination. The findings suggest that hydrogen's transition from hype to practical deployment requires strategic targeting of specific applications, substantial capital investment, and realistic timeline expectations aligned with technological development cycles

References:
1.    Bataille, C., Nilsson, M., Curbelo, J. and Diaz, D. (2023) 'The role of energy services demand reduction in net-zero energy transitions', Nature Energy, 8(1), pp. 54-63.
2.    Govindan, R., Shankar, M., Parthasarathy, P. & Pugazhenthi, R. (2023). Hydrogen production, utilization and storage: A comprehensive review. Journal of Energy Storage, 58, 106316.
3.    Hassan, Q., Sameen, A.Z., Salman, H.M. and Jaszczur, M. (2024) 'Hydrogen energy future: Advancements in storage technologies and implications for sustainability', Journal of Energy Storage, 80, 110345.
4.    Howarth, R.W. and Jacobson, M.Z. (2021) 'How green is blue hydrogen?', Energy Science & Engineering, 9(10), pp. 1676-1687.
5.    Hydrogen Council (2024) Hydrogen Insights 2024: An updated perspective on hydrogen investment, market development and momentum. Brussels: Hydrogen Council.
6.    Li, Y., O'Shea, R. and Lin, R. (2024) 'A perspective on three sustainable hydrogen production technologies with a focus on technology readiness level, cost of production and life cycle environmental impacts', Heliyon, 10(5), e26637.
7.    MDPI (2021) 'Hydrogen as a clean and sustainable energy vector for global transition from fossil-based to zero-carbon', Cleanroom Technology, 2(4), pp. 579-616.
8.    Odenweller, A. and Ueckerdt, F. (2024) 'The green hydrogen ambition and implementation gap', Nature Energy, 9(1), pp. 11-23. doi: 10.1038/s41560-024-01684-7
9.    O'Shea, R. and Lin, R. (2024) 'Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production methods', Renewable Energy, 203, pp. 412-428. PIB (2024) Year end review 2024 of Ministry of New & Renewable Energy: National Green Hydrogen Mission Progress. Press Information Bureau, Government of India. Available at: https://www.pib.gov.inAccessed:10 December 2024).
10.    Reuß, M., Grube, T., Robinius, M., Preuster, P., Wasserscheid, P. and Stolten, D. (2024) 'Seasonal storage and alternative carriers: A flexible hydrogen supply chain model', Applied Energy, 200, pp. 290-302.
11.    RMI (2024) Green hydrogen production pathways for India: Economic analysis and deployment scenarios. Rocky Mountain Institute. Available at: https://rmi.org/green-hydrogen-production-pathways-for-india (Accessed: 10 December 2024).
12.    Schlissel, D. and Juhn, A. (2024) Blue hydrogen: Not clean, not low carbon, not a solution. Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. Available at: https://ieefa.org.
 

DOI

https://doi.org/10.62226/ijarst20252097

PAGES : 1737-1745 | 5 VIEWS | 3 DOWNLOADS


Download Full Article

Engr. John Bender, Dr. Isaac C. Okereke and Mr. Meiko Tourista W, MM | From Hype too Fit-For-Purpose: Assessing the Viability of Hydrogen as Clean Energy | DOI : https://doi.org/10.62226/ijarst20252097

Journal Frequency: ISSN 2320-1126, Monthly
Paper Submission: Throughout the month
Acceptance Notification: Within 6 days
Subject Areas: Engineering, Science & Technology
Publishing Model: Open Access
Publication Fee: USD 60  USD 50
Publication Impact Factor: 6.76
Certificate Delivery: Digital

Publish your research with IJARST and engage with global scientific minds